Those of you who read this site will note that I tend to vary my themes quite a bit. It's not easy being a philosopher, scientist, metaphysician, mystic, writer, idealist, warrior, and prophet. Try it some time and you'll appreciate the dilemma I can assure you. It can get a little rough on the mind. This little essay is on astrology. La de da. Since everything competent tends to fall into my lap, having had a rather delicious view of the whole sha-bang as they say, here's another demonstration of being right.
Astrology on the whole is a great subject. Probably the most complicated of all subjects and mostly needlessly so by the very astrologers whose job it is to simplify the themes to easily understandable ideas for people that actually assist them. Sadly the profession is filled with too many lazy, indifferent, or incompetent people as is the case with many professions nowadays.
Currently Saturn and Pluto, two very important "heavy" planets are transiting through Capricorn. This is a time that conventional institutions receive a boost of power. Saturn and Pluto support conventional institutions in this placement. Anyone who says otherwise is an idiot and a liar.
It's good but hard times to be a Capricorn. It is a shitty time to be a Aries, Cancer, or Libra or if you have any major personal planets (Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, and Mars) in those signs if they are in the aspect orb for Saturn and Pluto. Since the aspect orb is very large for the squares (8 degrees) and the conjunctions/oppositions (10 degrees) most of you Aries, Cancers, and Libras are really looking forward to when these two heavy planets go and harass someone else.
Collectively Cancer is the sign of the past and looking back. I've got a moon there so I've been feeling the horrible effects of Pluto for years though it is almost out of the orb for myself. Saturn is currently harassing my moon and I've got an inclination to dump the past and the whole let's remember everything forever inclination that a moon in Cancer gives one. It ain't easy, let me tell ya!
As Cancer is the sign opposing Pluto and Saturn right now, collectively this is a time when our attachment to the past, the mother, and conservative ways is broken. These are among the many things associated with the sign of Cancer which is getting hammered by the unpleasant duo of Saturn and Pluto. Once sundered there is no going back. Thank Goddess for that! We were really sick of having to watch the goddamn reruns in our emotional bodies anyway. So long to useless trash I say! I'd say burn it down too but you have to wait for a good Mars transit for that.
In any case, till Mars joins the ritual of annihilation we'll just have to go along with the existing show. Believe me the collective doesn't want to have this experience. It's fighting tooth and nail for every ounce of the way things used to be. But dudes and dudettes, it's an over and done with deal. Get over it. This is a very important lesson for those with major influences in Cancer. I can relate not just because my Moon is there but because the Moon is my most powerful planet.
Collectively the end of all nostalgia for what was is happening. It is the end as the forces of destruction and structure oppose everything that was. The past is being crushed and broken by the power of existing institutions of order and power. This is also a very bad time to be a conservative because Cancer is the sign of the conservative way. So all's not good news for the right, in case you were taking this as an essay on the political system as it exists through what is loosely called "ideology" but is in fact more akin to the people who want change versus the people who don't.
For many years I read how Pluto was going to destroy the establishment. While it's in the sign of the establishment? Hardly. Pluto lends power to the sign it passes through so they get an extra wallop of power and will. Notice the increasing power of the central order? Notice how everyone wants to be in power now so they can wield that enormous "advantage"? Yeah, the astrologers that said otherwise were fools. I believed them till I did my own analysis and realized, nope, only an incompetent moron could fail with Pluto conjugating their planetary positions. Oh, how I wish it were true, but it's not. That's the way it is.
Luckily for all of us this transit of Saturn will end in 2020 when the increase of order of power of the existing order will no longer be supported by the planetary lords of that process. Looking for the decline of the establishment? Look to the transit of Neptune in Aries beginning in 2025. That's when you'll see a new dawn starting in spiritual force. It's a long way off for those of you wishing for something better. But it's better to be sober looking at the truth than lying to one's self with bad half baked astrology predictions based upon a lack of logic. Just look at what conjunctions are and you'll see that I'm right (as usual).
What this means is that power belongs to those that support the structure of order and opposes those who argue for a return to the past. A return to the past is not possible with this transit! There is no going back. Pluto and Saturn are opposing it! What they want is order at any cost. That order means more rules, more control, and more domination. If you can't get with the program, that process will steamroll you into the gutter. Don't mess with Pluto or Saturn. This is especially true when they will conjunct in the sky in January 2020. The establishment will be at the height of its power. Not a good time to be a ordinary human being on Earth. Sorry, the news is the news. Don't blame me, blame yourselves.
Consciousness is a necessary component of being alive on Earth. Reading the signs correctly is another. If you can't read the signs correctly, then you need to get out of the business of prediction. Those who have been predicting falsely will also have their day. They will be laughed out of the public square. I'm not afraid of that because if I'm wrong then everything will turn out fine and everyone will forget about it. But if I'm right, which I am, then you'll all see it happen. The establishment will reach the zenith of it's power in 2020. It's won't start a precipitous decline until Neptune reaches Aries when warriors of spirit will rise up to attack it. That's 2025. The future isn't written in stone, as I've stated before, but everything happens in cycles so what's happening on the ground will make this true.
You have been informed about the matter I trust now. The story of the unconscious is one of patterns that repeat until one becomes conscious of them. If you are conscious you can make a difference. If you aren't, then you can't. You're just another number then as far as the universe is concerned. Get with it and learn or just be another loser. That's life on Earth. Wake up people!
The Great Con: Fate
Fate is the greatest con job in the universe. A bunch of lazy liars came up with the idea one day while they were dreaming up a better con to fool everyone into buying into something. It was a sneaky ruse. And the fools bought it like the suckers that they were.
Why, you might ask, as if you give a damn! The answer, obviously, is that everyone needs something to sell. You see that's the great trick behind the great con, the one that goes on everywhere as far as the eye can see. You look out, and it's so obvious. Everyone is lying, cheating, stealing, and trying to get away with it. So then, if you see it clearly, why bother with the rest of the bullshit they sell?
Perhaps the people pleasing deceivers among you would insist that buying into their bullshit is what makes them happy. No, I say, no! You have all of you been deceived by your own stupid! You must understand, your con job act isn't going to fool anyone except yourself maybe if you take it too far.
But think upon the matter of fate for a minute. What is it? How can it exist at all? Well if everything were a giant computer system made by some mysterious cosmic powers then fate would be what it is that you will do in the program. And there in lies the lie! Choice is within the realm of your power. Yet that has nothing to do with fate. So then if fate isn't a lie, it's just a ruse. It's irrelevant to the quest of life itself.
This is absolutely critical to understand. Fate means nothing! Nothing! It's a mental phantasm your mind invents to keep you in compliance with whoever is selling the idea so that they don't bash you over the head for questioning orders. That's what fate is in this world. In the rest of the transdimensional reality, sure it's there. But it's character that counts, not fate. It's choice and character that moves the destiny of worlds. Thus fatalism, accepting the idea of having no choice because of the mental abstract "fate", is the greatest sin against woman and man.
Another poor way of phrasing this idea that is commonly heard is the idea that "fate is what you make of it". Now whoever came up with that particular line of what passes for "reasoning" should be fired..out of a cannon..into the sun. I cannot stress that enough. Fate is NOT what you make of it. Choice and character are what make you, fate doesn't matter! This is what I mean when I talk about the problem of pop philosophy. A cynical man or woman might think that someone purposely misled everyone by twisting their minds with meaningless ideas so they could never get anywhere through the powers of thought control. Who would do such a thing? You'd be surprised.
None the less, whether by accident or conspiracy, fate is still the greatest con job in the universe. The rest, as they say, though you shouldn't trust them even if they say it, is up to you. Onward towards victory!
Why, you might ask, as if you give a damn! The answer, obviously, is that everyone needs something to sell. You see that's the great trick behind the great con, the one that goes on everywhere as far as the eye can see. You look out, and it's so obvious. Everyone is lying, cheating, stealing, and trying to get away with it. So then, if you see it clearly, why bother with the rest of the bullshit they sell?
Perhaps the people pleasing deceivers among you would insist that buying into their bullshit is what makes them happy. No, I say, no! You have all of you been deceived by your own stupid! You must understand, your con job act isn't going to fool anyone except yourself maybe if you take it too far.
But think upon the matter of fate for a minute. What is it? How can it exist at all? Well if everything were a giant computer system made by some mysterious cosmic powers then fate would be what it is that you will do in the program. And there in lies the lie! Choice is within the realm of your power. Yet that has nothing to do with fate. So then if fate isn't a lie, it's just a ruse. It's irrelevant to the quest of life itself.
This is absolutely critical to understand. Fate means nothing! Nothing! It's a mental phantasm your mind invents to keep you in compliance with whoever is selling the idea so that they don't bash you over the head for questioning orders. That's what fate is in this world. In the rest of the transdimensional reality, sure it's there. But it's character that counts, not fate. It's choice and character that moves the destiny of worlds. Thus fatalism, accepting the idea of having no choice because of the mental abstract "fate", is the greatest sin against woman and man.
Another poor way of phrasing this idea that is commonly heard is the idea that "fate is what you make of it". Now whoever came up with that particular line of what passes for "reasoning" should be fired..out of a cannon..into the sun. I cannot stress that enough. Fate is NOT what you make of it. Choice and character are what make you, fate doesn't matter! This is what I mean when I talk about the problem of pop philosophy. A cynical man or woman might think that someone purposely misled everyone by twisting their minds with meaningless ideas so they could never get anywhere through the powers of thought control. Who would do such a thing? You'd be surprised.
None the less, whether by accident or conspiracy, fate is still the greatest con job in the universe. The rest, as they say, though you shouldn't trust them even if they say it, is up to you. Onward towards victory!
Thoughts on the Basic Cosmic Set
Thoughts on the Basic Cosmic Set
During the course of my
meditations on my visions, an idea was presented to me that the cosmos revolved
around the theme of repeating patterns of evolving spirits incarnating as celestial
objects and celestial formations rooted in singular celestial objects. This idea was the idea of the planetary,
solar, galactic, metagalactic, etc archon ring cycle. Essentially, infinite desire should over time
give rise to the experience of incarnation as a cosmic being who creates in the
higher planes and then in the lower planes.
The essential nature of the
archon was thus visualized to be a being who lived on the etheric plane in a
sort of preincarnation existence which lasted about half the full length of
time of incarnation that would be created and lived a life in that plane rehearsing
its experience before incarnating as whatever it was going to incarnate as in
the physical. The rehearsal was done
with the others it was going to incarnate with a-prioii to the incarnation.
As I studied the idea of the
archons and allowed myself the flow of the mystery through the mystic experience
of visions certain messages came to me regarding what it would require to prove
the existence of this entire idea. The
primary concept around which this idea would be proven would be what I call the
“Basic Set” or the “Basic Cosmic Set” which is the experiencing in creation
that allowed a being to go from an electron in the cosmos to a full fledged
lunar body, the planetary archon 1. The
exact dimensions of this planetary Archon 1 weren’t clear, but the general rule
of a trillion times for each level of the cosmos and each level of higher consciousness
is what I settled on as a formula observing the nature of what we see in the
universe.
Logically, if we believe in reincarnation,
then the number of cycles it takes for a being to evolve is essentially scientifically
fixed to an average around which the growth of the being follows an expected path
of development across multiple worlds of creation until finally they emerge as a
full fledged Planetary Archon 1.
The science surrounding this
should be based on a known mathematical formula based on the evolutions in the
physical world first, and then in the higher dimensions second. So, first we must understand the basic nature
of the physical universe in all its aspects in order to understand the number
of cycles it would take for a being to evolve in the cosmic hierarchy to higher
stations of development. Such an
undertaking is not at all a light affair, but a rather heavy, if not the
heaviest, set of thinking concerning the nature of the soul and how that souls
evolves. We are dealing with a science
of reincarnation here that is exacting in its precision.
My essential idea of the basic set
must be first analyzed in the context of how I personally see the physical
universe’s cycles of creation. I believe
the physical universe functions essentially as the technological universe and
the lower natural universe for the cosmos.
Here matter is the basic resource and all energy is tied to it as we
well know hopefully by now. The themes
of the physical universe all revolve around the emergence of civilizations on planets
that seek to go out into space and explore and colonize areas of development
and create wealth for themselves and their future reincarnating selves in the
context of a single civilization until such time as a cosmic disaster or rare
ego based invasion of another species destroys them.
The physical universe is ruled
by the natural cycles of cosmic ray abundance caused by the natural cycles of rotation
creating the seasons of the cosmos.
These seasons correspond to the periods of growth and expansion and
contraction and shortage we would find in the cosmos. Most of the cosmos is governed, in my guesstimate, by great cycles of peace which last 200 times longer than the
cycles of war and 2000 times the cycles of heavy darkness (corruption).
During the times of peace, the
cosmos is ruled by different sets of principle discovered by benevolent cosmic
citizens, the sentients, who have evolved full conscious civilizations and
essentially treat the cosmos as part of a divine master plan. These civilizations seek to catalog and know
the cosmos and all the beings in it besides attempting to consciously and
conscientiously grow their own civilizations as part of their cosmic
rights. Each time a being is born into
an incarnation chain, the being in question lives a long series of lifetimes,
possibly as long as trillions of years even in the initial emergences, in one
of these groups.
Because the physical universe
revolves around these patterns, it is rare for the existence of societies who
wish to live a more primitive life such as those depicted in magical themes in
our fiction. These must exist, however,
and it is my general opinion that the ratio in the physical universe between
those who wish to live technological vs. natural "magical" lives is about 4 to 1,
but that the definition of natural is different when considering the question
of the nature of physical cosmic systems as per their primary drives.
This last part, a sort of
strange argument for anyone who doesn’t live in my head, is related to the idea
that of the “technological” peoples of the physical universe (they are of
course all technological technically), only about half are truly technological
in the sense of what type of universe it is they are creating. Half of those technological people are living
in a natural universe by preference, meaning that technology supplements an organic
lifecycle for natural born beings. These
beings, thus, limit their populations to a certain amount to account for the
idea that nature is primary. They may
use technology greatly, but they are not trying to turn the cosmos into a giant
computer system run by robots.
The other half of the cosmos is
either run by robots or is so pro-technology that natural systems are seen to supplement
the maximum sustainable sentient population theory of development. This is the true technological universe. In that universe, it’s ultimate end goal is
to create dyson spheres everywhere for the conversion of all matter into sentient
populations. The end result of this
universe is an energy crisis and what I refer to as an Archon crisis because the
stars are largely destroyed or completely chained to dyson sphere machinery in
order to sustain massive populations, most often of robots and beings who have chosen
to evolve as cybernetic organisms of various sorts.
Once one understand the whole of
this idea, one begins to see what the nature of the physical cosmos is
like. Luckily, those that live in the cosmos
rarely allow for the mass development of the whole thing into a technological
nightmare. Instead, core regions tend
towards more technology whereas outer regions tend to be more towards
nature. There is a boundary point
between the two paradigms that are usually balanced. This boundary point is the point at which
sentient species use more cosmic rays than the cosmos produces to sustain
natural star growth and development.
This is the critical boundary between the half of the natural universe
that stays natural and the half that chooses to go technological.
In addition to these two parts, one
in five regions in general remain “magical” which is natural with specific
properties of elements that allows for the evolution of what we know as magic
in our fictional stories. These emerge
from the incorporation of elements that are projectively radioactive into organic
bodies which is easier at higher expansion pressures (see Mark McCutcheon’s the
Final Theory or my essay on Expansion Theory which is the Core Essay on
chrisfreely.com) where more elements exist on the periodic table. As a consequence of the requirements for more
expansion pressure, these areas would be considered outside the safe boundaries
of a natural universe anyway until such time as they evolve to incorporate the
necessary technology or natural systems to overcome the problems of going from
areas with one expansion pressure to areas with another (a very, very hard
problem to solve even compared with building arrays of thousands of dyson spheres
as far as I can tell).
None the less, the basic idea is
that the physical universe is divided into different domains of activity. At the bottom domains with fewer natural
physical elements occupying about 4/7ths of the cosmos a conflict exists
between technologically developing species and natural developing species which
divides the physical cosmos into two general areas that are defined by
technology and nature even though both are dominated by species that are essentially
space faring technology driven development oriented. The balance of the cosmic good slightly
prefers nature over technology, but at times technology is considered better
usually for survival reasons as technology is hardier and better at surviving
more conditions. The remaining 3/7ths of the cosmos
is split between "magical" and "transmagical" regions dominated by beings that may
have a greater inclination to avoid technology for a much, much longer time
period and who have natural defenses against technology in the form of the
natural properties of their universe which allows for a natural defense
mechanism against beings who have technology from regions of lower expansion pressure
density. 2/7ths of the cosmos is the
region that is essentially “magical” and 1/7th is “transmagical”
where powers such as what we consider to be superpowers may emerge naturally
from the even higher expansion pressure of these regions of the cosmos. The general idea is that transmagical is even
more powerful than magical and represents what we might consider divine powers
as opposed to ordinary magical powers.
Now, beings would obviously want
to incarnate in the more powerful regions of the cosmos, so there is a training
time that occurs in the lower regions essentially by incarnation chain. Want to incarnate in a realm of magic? First you have to pay the entry fee
karmically by being incarnated in a loser planet like Earth and finish the
proving ground tests. And what holds
together who can incarnate where? Well,
that’s where the Archons come in, for they guard the physical realms as it is
they who create them in their mind’s journey as pre-incarnate beings who serve
the greater cosmic spiritual powers in planes above them. Serve them well and you are rewarded and
allowed to incarnate in their realms.
Serve them badly and it’s back to a dump like Earth where you have to relearn
all your lessons all over again. Well,
not quite. Actually, Earth is just a
planet where everything is just starting up and we don’t any real magic except
the kind old occult philosophers obsess over in their boredom.
Now, cosmic cycles take a long
time to complete so when one incarnates somewhere, that’s where you are for anywhere
from hundreds of millions to trillions of years (for more ancient spirits the
amount of time just gets longer and longer up to infinity in theory). That’s where the basic set comes in. Understanding the basic set is the key to
knowing the answer of how long it is we spend in creation doing these various
projects as part of the life of a particular group of souls as a particular sentient
species in the physical universe.
The basic set is built around
the idea that beings are born naturally as electrons. A certain number of lifecycles as an electron
is required to evolve beyond that stage in consciousness when the electron is
presumably destroyed for the last time and the spirit that is within it is
processed by the creative powers of the transdimensional realms above the
physical. An electron evolves into
something. An atom evolves into
something. A being must spend a certain amount
of time as a plant, and then a certain number of evolutions as an animal. After that is must eventually evolve a conscience
somewhere in the cosmos through ultimate selfless sacrifice to have a sentient
soul body. This is when it is now a
Sentient Archon 1.
The difference in power from a
Sentient Archon 1 to a Planetary Archon 1 I assumed was a trillion. A sentient Archon 1 is a planetary bound
spirit because there just aren’t that many asteroids around to allow for small
bodies to exist in space in such large numbers as the math requires. This creates one of the more interesting metaphysical
problems of soul theory whereby the Planetary Archons and above are anchored to
the cosmic chain of creation whereas the Sentient Archons and below are
anchored to the planet’s world soul more so in order to incarnate their
afterlives within it. It’s a bit of a
complex idea to get your brain around. The
whole entire basic set, when mapped out, is literally the science of evolution
of the soul as a set of principles that tells you the mathematical relationship
between these levels of creation and the math of the entire reincarnation
system up until Planetary Archon 1.
This, of course, cannot be a
small system. My first intuitions on the
matter was that it would take hundreds of incarnation cycles on something like
800 initial planets or more to go from Sentient Archon 1 to Planetary Archon
1. Now that isn’t math, but when I
started doing the fuzzy math just with what I thought I knew at the time of
probable lengths of time the numbers were still in the high hundreds. That’s hundreds of sentient species alone
that a being has to incarnate through not counting their transdimensional
lifecycles as spirit beings in higher planes of creation. When we add the math up in the larger estimates
this is quadrillions of years just to get from Sentient Archon 1 to Planetary
Archon 1 to earn higher permissions in cosmic creation.
The idea of needing higher
permissions is based on the concept that the cosmos is ruled by higher dimensional
beings who have mentally created the domains of the cosmos that we live in as
sentients a-priorii to nature having formed them through its processes which
occur within the context of the cosmic mind internally as a process. In other words, nature’s machinery is on a
lower plane of operation than the will of creation of the beings who shape the
cosmos as it moves slower and within the context of the will of creation of the
desires of cosmic spirit beings. The
planets and stars are these very Archons who have created themselves in the
same way it is presumed that the lesser and tiny yet more able to determine their
destiny sentients have created their lives in the higher planes by
previsualization in the higher spirit bodies as angels(A common spiritual and
New Age concept). It is only by service
to the will of the cosmos’s highest good that permissions to exist are granted
by these cosmic gatekeepers who are older in general than those who live on the
surface as sentients.
Another concept that is critical
to understand about my paradigm is the idea of the cosmic voyeur god and goddess
and multiple layers of cosmic voyeurism that excludes sexual domains of
activity. The desire to be cosmic god or
goddess, not an Archon as they don’t actually observe the lives of other beings
in such a way, is the desire to observe creation from a higher plane almost as
if you were watching a living simulation.
It is the desire to create something that is a living simulation from
your desire, the same as the computer programmer or story teller desires to see
how things play out with his or her creations.
God and Goddess on this higher plane are, in fact, the cosmic voyeurs
who watch over but don’t interfere with the creation which occurs within their
spirit space and the powers that thought of what it was before it came into
being.
The basic set has to account for
this time as well, as beings do live out these sorts of experiences in lesser
regards it is presumed before they become greater at this process, such as
being the God/Goddess of a town long before one is a God/Goddess of a galaxy. The cosmos is then linked together through
these different fields of consciousness in higher planes of creation creating a
sort of dynamic field of consciousness that is beyond the realm of physical
humans to relate to or experience in any easy way except through advanced altered
states of consciousness which have great cost to those pursuing them.
Then there is the problem of the
human ego that is beyond the scope of this essay which is focused on the idea
of the basic set as the ultimate map of cosmic relationships in principle. In order to know for sure it is necessary to
observe the physical universe and construct a map of known relationships
between essential ratios of physicality in creation. One important fact, for instance, is what is
the guaranteed number of planets that can be terraformed by a species such as ours
in a normal natural galaxy based on the fair and just ordering of a species
natural rights to express their highest and most obvious ambitions as having
just arrived in a galaxy. Since 200 galaxies out of 201 are run by good
species, it is logical that these species have already solved the formula and
had conventions about this for hundred of millions, billions, trillions, or
even quadrillions of years. In other
words, it is a known known because they have had time to think about it. I had assumed the answer was probably a round
number, most likely 1000, but we certainly can’t say for sure only that in all
likelihood there is a figure that is known by whoever runs this galaxy as its chief
power.
This critical question
determines the average rank of the highest level being in a natural born
civilization such as ours because the permissions have to line up with the
Archon ranks to keep the synchronicity of the cosmos in balance. While this is beyond the basic set, the basic
set is critical to answering other questions concerning cosmic soul age of the more
ancient spirits who are the oldest and most powerful of the beings on a
particular planet, the planet’s natural leaders. You should know them well by now, you are expecting
one of them to return and bring about the Kingdom of God. Do you think that Jesus Christ was an
ordinary soul even if he was an ordinary human?
The answers should be obviously to anyone who studies karma,
reincarnation, and the order of the cosmos.
It is generally assumed by myself
that all the greatest human minds and hearts that have lived are the ancient
beings here to guide the less old beings forwards in consciousness. This is a common theme in evolution that
teachers are present to guide others in their own understanding of their own
place in the cosmos. There are those who
have gone forwards in consciousness in order to show the path to those that
walk afterwards. Now it would be great
if this walk were over and the whole of humanity understood everything it
needed to know about peace, but even the idea of eternal life is rejected by
the human ego.
The idea of the basic cosmic set
thus is left for generations of the future to solve. It is a massive problem that no small order
of proof must be forged to support. As
the atheist majority, representative of the human ego of the Aquarian Age, will
reject this idea as being “childish” and beneath it’s egoic dignity to
consider, it will be left to the more pure spirits of a more childish age to consider
past the serious frowns of the worldwide dominant church of atheism. Well certainly God is dead for the Goddess
has risen! But the voyeur God somewhere in
a mirror world beyond ours is certainly laughing about the stupidity of human
kind. For now we will just have to live
with the idea that all of what I have written here is just art, and thus sing
the praises of scientific atheism as we explore the universe as humans in all
it’s glory.
The Alternative To Cosmic Ray Powered Stars
You can download a copy of this essay here to help spread the word.
The Alternative to Cosmic Ray Powered Stars
by Chris Freely
While creating the cosmic ray powered stars, galaxies, and universe model years ago I had to seriously consider alternative thoughts with regard to our current model, the fusion powered solar paradigm. I considered the implications of expansion theory in this in order to complete the work began by Mark McCutcheon and to seriously consider whether there were any scenarios under which a universe could exist powered on hydrogen fusion as envisioned by our current ideas.
The model that I developed I called the Hydrogen Regeneration Hydrogen Fusion Universe was based on the idea that hydrogen, if it were possible to generate fusion energy from true proton-proton fusion, would be recycled in this type of universe. While I ultimately rejected this idea for reasons described below, a basic overview will show the most plausible mechanisms in my understanding of Expansion Theory that might explain our current solar paradigms using the new theory.
In proton-proton fusion as it is currently envisioned through various steps in different types of main sequence stars, four protons combine to form a helium nucleus. The difference in the mass of four hydrogen atoms and one helium atom is then assumed to be released in the form of energy through Einstein's E=MC^2 equation automatically liberating the energy. A star is theoretically supported by the force of the fusion of protons that take place in the star's nucleus. A balance then is created between the amount of fusion necessary to keep the star's current size and gravity which is constantly driving this process. This is visioned as a dynamic equilibrium in current models.
The question must be asked, where does the energy to propel the liberated missing mass from the protons in the proton-proton fusion reactions come from? In our current theories there is essentially no answer. E=MC^2 automatically applies for some reason no one has clearly defined and that no one can clearly explain. McCutcheon's expansion theory offers a plausible solution to this dilemma as physical mechanisms may exist plausibly in our current hypothetical realms of the possible.
Mark, in his book though, stuck with a similar Einstein idea that simply said once the electrons (the basic particle of matter in the universe of which everything including protons and neutrons are made in the new theory) are released from their nuclear confinement they automatically just expand at a massive rate (because they are already doing so anyway within the atom) and are thus liberated as free energy. This is similar to Einstein's idea though with a graphical representation of liberated electron clusters flying through non-atomic space at the huge non nuclear natural expansion rate of the electron in that the electron automatically has this energy built into it somehow without having to account for it in any way. I couldn't agree to the idea in total because it denies the fact that energy is carried by these electrons as a function of their relative motion, which in physics analysis is called vector motion.
In my own analysis I found that the idea that freely expanding electron clusters carried huge energy difficult to digest in light of the problem of vector motion which I wrote about extensively in the analysis. Essentially, the problem is that energy is still energy. When things move they have an inertia and that energy is conserved and vector motion needs to be conserved if things aren't going to get too weird. Freely expanding electron clusters, in my estimation, simply cannot be ejected from the nucleus and be expected to carry a massive energy automatically. I could not visual this idea at all as it failed logical tests in my own mind concerning the ideas of energy. Of course I accepted the idea of the clusters expansion, just not the free energy lunch part of it.
The alternative to this is to construct a mechanism within the nucleus to account for energy as it is classically understood (more or less). In our case we would have to construct a model of the proton that would allow for the energy to be liberated through a mechanism similar to that of a spring. A metal spring stores physical energy and a spring represents the best analogy to something that may, once it's pent up structure is unhinged, release stored physical energy in a manner that is consistent with latent buildup of pressure in structure. If the hydrogen atom is so constructed, then indeed it would be possible to make such a process work assuming the energy contained in the structure in sufficient once liberated to account for what is required for the solar fusion model to work. I have suggested that deuterium and tritium as well as other proven energetically releasing atoms and isotopes have some pent up structural mechanism at work that when broken releases this stored pressure within their structure.
In such a system, an energy storing mechanism would have to be constructed to account for why energy was stored in hydrogen in the first place. The mechanism I decided on was cosmic ray bombardment of the heavy nuclei of deep space and old stellar cores. These cosmic rays could reintroduce energy into what are (in current theory) considered to be energy poor nucleuses (from the point of view of current fusion theory), especially Iron and Cobalt which are considered in current theory to be the least energetic nucleuses for nuclear fusion (or fission for that matter). Again, that all has to do with the amount of mass in the nucleus as measured relative to other nucleusus in the current E=MC^2 standard model paradigm. But for our purposes what we are looking for as students of the new Expansion Theory is how hydrogen gets its extra energy that allows it to expel it's "energy per nucleon" into light in the form of electron clusters as the new theory states that light consists of.
This is explained hypothetically by the idea that cosmic rays impart changes in structure to the proton when they impact these large nucleusus in deep space breaking them apart and recharging the universal supply of hydrogen that gets used up in our current model by stars. In a universe without a big bang you have to explain how it is that everything hasn't quite ended given the fact that all the hydrogen is constantly being used up. So, obviously, over time, the cosmic rays have to reintroduce the energy back into the equation by evaporating large white dwarves and other old dead stellar cores in our current model slowly converting back into the original material that we currently think of as being the most important for energy generation. That is, of course, hydrogen.
So we have a plausible physical mechanism of energy storage in hydrogen and a cycle that accounts for what we observe in the universe without resulting in any big bang shenanigans. However, the problem now is the problem of the lack of a real physical model of the atom. We don't have one yet. And in addition, the bigger problem is that protons, as we understand them now, are just too simple of a structure to be structured in a way that suggests they could possibly store energy through a complex mechanism that allows for such a hypothetical pressure storage whether spring like or not. The more complex deuterium and tritium don't have this problem. And that creates a big pickle for the nuclear powered fusion model in the new Expansion Theory paradigm.
While I envisioned a proton as being made of huge numbers of electrons as described in my core essay, an idea strongly supported by existing physical experiments primarily Max Plank's, the simple number of electrons still isn't sufficient to account for the complexity suggested. There is no current evidence of a complex hydrogen nucleus that suggest it could possibly store energy in such a manner. Now, of course, no one has had to look for one yet, but still it would require a huge amount of research and thinking to suggest where we could go from here with this idea. It goes against everything we think we know so far in that hydrogen is the simple nucleus consisting of a single proton and an single electron "probability" cloud. Where would it hide a mechanism for the mechanical storage of energy? Deuterium and tritium have at least a neutron or two and a proton that could overlap accounting for the stored energy, but what about the lowly proton?
In this idea we consider the classical case for energy again as known physics suggests. Energy is motion and vector motion is conserved so that energy outside the boundary of the expanding electron is real in this world. It doesn't diminish so the universe is a mechanical machine made of expanding electrons and the ever present vector motion of these very electrons that are the carriers of this motion and are the transformers of it in space (again my core essay goes into the physical descriptions in great detail and what would properly be described as the physical philosophy of expanding matter and energy).
In order to support the idea of standard fusion in the new model mechanical energy must be stored in the hydrogen atom to account for the energy necessary to support stars as they are currently envisioned in the fusion model of stars. No physical proof of these support structures exists. No physical model exists. No explanation that is based on real physics exist. Our current stellar theories are a fantasy. They have no basis in real science. They have never been proven through extensive observation. Constant new evidence is being discovered which discounts what is claimed in the finer points of current stellar theory. And more new evidence will come to light exposing the weaknesses in current theory with each passing year.
Yet cosmic ray powered stars have a support mechanism that I have described vividly in complete physical detail down to a great extent. That is a fact.
For those who wish to try and salvage the only thing that is possibly even remotely salvageable from convention cosmology, the fusion powered model of the star, I have given you all the tools necessary to find what it is you must be looking for. Good luck. And it would be delightful if you gave me some credit when you start down your thought experiments. I was there first pointing you in the right direction. May the best theory win in the light of the evidence of science.
The Myth of Wave Particle Duality And The New Language of Physics
You can download a copy of this essay for free here to help spread the word.
The Myth of Wave Particle Duality and the New Language of Physics
by Chris Freely
But quantum physics as is generally interpreted disposed of the idea of ether, the hypothetical substance that made up space in the period of classical physics, which is the medium in which the propagation of the waves of electromagnetic radiation was originally conceived. So then how can a wave be a wave without a medium? This is quite a big problem.
Now the new concepts presented by Mark McCutcheon solve the problem by presenting the idea in a clear way that demonstrates that light is made of electron clusters and as such the number of clusters per second is what creates the frequency of light (which in our current models is directly related to the so called wavelength through the equation c = wavelength X frequency). Mark's Expansion Theory shows that light is not a wave at all, but instead a solid stream of matter moving at light speed (or possibly faster or slower depending on conditions) as a classical physics stream of solid matter. As such light behaves exactly as solid matter should behave in a classical physics reality.
Light has a mass associated with the particle stream of electron clusters, and it has a classical physics inertia associated with the fact it is in motion through space. This inertia is "converted" to "energy" when light strikes an object. Here what we call "energy" is in fact motion imparted by the impacting electron clusters onto the object in question which is also made up of electrons and electron clusters themselves.
This immediately shows us the new paradigm model of processes in the molecular level of the universe. Everything is based on classical physics motions of particles with the exception of the expansion rate of the electron itself (see the core essay on this website for a longer explanation). The easiest part of this idea to understand is that while many of the ideas of physics remain in tact in terms of their utility such as units for force, energy, mass, etc., the actual idea of the physical systems is solely based on one fundamental process: energy in motion. The electrons only provide the mass in the equation which in my core essay is elaborated upon as physical resistance to the passage of motion fundamentally.
Motion can be understood to be essentially the flow or liquidity of the universe. While the electron is a "solid" expanding vibration, the flow of the motion is a transformational effect of dynamic fluid force. In this it is not quantized at all, but instead has the full range of the microinfinite (the infinite range of possible quantification between 1 and 0). This would be consistent with the idea that motion can exist in all possible states of relative speed to other objects.
However, the system created by the expanding electron, when studied completely, would reveal that the expansion itself is what creates the dynamic automatically as a byproduct of the mass transformation of motion. This is an extension of what I have written of in my core essay. Essentially, as electrons expand, the "definition of mass" changes due to the transformation of space caused by the electron's expansion so that vector motion is conserved as well as intertia. Inertia created in the atomic and subatomic realms is thus preserved independent of the electron's transformation of space around it due to its expansion. This follows otherwise energy as we know it would have no meaning and the world around us proves that energy as in the joule appears to be consistently present in terms of actual effect on matter, because, of course it is all connected together rather seamlessly through what we call observation (cue singing angels). This also applies to our classical measurement of force as well.
With this understanding we can see the larger context of Expansion Theory fused to the concept of fluid dynamics with the preservation of mass/inertia. However, what we see at the basic level is purely a physical fluidity of purely physical motion and inertia in physical space with a purely physical transformation of space due to, on the surface, a purely physical expansion of a purely physical vibration which is the electron itself as a vibration that takes the form of a sphere expanding in space. Transdimensional theory gets into the question of what the hell it is that the electron is expanding in and what is its nature incidental to the set of fields of consciousness that exist universally. And that is where we leave material physics behind. But for now, the physicists will have to be satisfied with that answer.
Cosmic Ray Powered Stars Vs. The Electric Universe Model Stars
You can download a copy of the essay for free here to help spread the word.
Cosmic Ray Powered Stars Versus The Electric Universe Model Stars
By Chris Freely
Those who have read my core essay on the new science will be familiar with new concepts on the nature of the stellar evolution that have been presented. These ideas are related to and very similar to the electrical universe model's version of how stars are created but with significant modifications based on the idea that stars are powered by external cosmic ray bombardment of their magnetic field instead of by electrical currents in the galaxy as in the electric universe model. Another key difference in the two ideas is that I am using Mark McCutcheon's basic idea on the nature of physics, Expansion Theory, which eliminates the concept of charge as we understand it because expanding electrons do not need an imaginary positive and negative center to flow as rivers of current as conceived of in this model. The third key difference between the electrical universe concept and the cosmic ray powered star model is the concept of hyperdense matter cores whereby the vast majority of stars have very dense cores at their hearts. This changes the mechanisms of stellar and planetary birth from the electrical universe's mechanism which involves z-pinch effects in plasma as discussed extensively here.
In both models planets and stars are born from other planets and stars usually involving large explosions such as nova and supernova. In the electrical universe model these explosions are caused by z-pinch effects in galactic electrical currents. In the cosmic ray powered star paradigm explosions are caused by instability in the hyperdense matter core of the star caused by pressure changes most likely due to melting of the core over time as the amount of energy in the magnetic field increases and/or magnetic and electrical overload caused by the increasing amount of energy of the field over time. Current conventional astrophysics, of course, believes that stars are powered from nuclear fusion and I deal with many of the problems with this theory in my core essay as well as in my cosmogenesis notes. Supernovas are caused in conventional astrophysics primarily because of the iron catastrophe in current nuclear fusion models whereby any attempt to fuse iron will result in a failure to generate additional energy and cause the star to go supernova.
The electrical universe model also discounts the existence of black holes believing active galactic nuclei are plasma effects of the galactic plasma currents in the galaxy (once again focusing on z-pinch effects if I remember correctly). The current cosmic ray model I have created incorporates very large stellar bodies which function as centers of galaxies, just not as infinitely dense singularities described by current astrophysics. I have termed these objects dark quasars if not active and quasars as active. Active galactic nuclei represent a midway point between a very active quasar and quiet dark quasar. In this understanding "black holes" at the center of galaxies are very large stars essentially that are putting out most of their energy in the non-visible upper band of the EM spectrum (microwave on up) and occasionally burst into very powerful states where they release massive amounts of energy like a normal star except in a massive way.
In the cosmic ray powered universe there is no upper limit to how large these dark quasars can get as long as more matter can be incorporated into them through absorbing other objects presumably (though I suggest other less plausible mechanisms of matter gain as well in my core essay). In this analogy of the cosmos, systems and cores just keep getting bigger up to infinity as we look at larger and larger slices of the cosmos.
Quasars would occasionally explode as very, very large supernovas that divide the quasar in two creating two new galaxies from the new cores. We would need to figure out a way to tell which galaxies we see out in space are in the process of dividing and which are in the process of colliding in this analysis. Also, another important assumption is that the primary means that stars and galaxies grow apart in the cosmic ray powered cosmos is radiative pressure from their light and cosmic rays. Such an idea would suggest that when quasars split up, the process of the galaxies separating out would generally be quiet slow, though the force of the explosion that creates the new core may push it out quiet far. I haven't done the math required to estimate, but observations of the galaxies with this idea in mind should be able to sort out what is what and how it's happening.
Additional ideas I discussed in my core essay deal with larger themes of Mark McCutcheon's Expansion Theory in light of the cosmic ray powered cosmic model. One of the issues that I considered was the possibility of different expansion pressure levels in different areas of the cosmos. This is not something Mark dealt with in his original theory but I believe it follows that depending on how the whole physical system is structured in light of the transdimensional structure of the cosmos in higher dimensions it might be possible to envision such a system where some regions of the cosmos had a different chemical periodic table and much higher densities of possible matter than others because the amount of expansion pressure would be much higher. I could not satisfy this level of analysis in the time I've had so far, but have introduced it as a concept that should be considered in an expanded cosmology hypothetically.
The issues with this idea resolve a problem I had with the idea that the cosmos had to only have one possible set of periodic tables. I believe Mark did deal with the idea that the rate of electron expansion could change in Expansion Theory in his original book by stating it may have been different in the past and could be different in the future. Such change, of course, suggests that different regions of space could hypothetically have different rates of expansion for the electron. I envisioned this on a very grand scale where the regions would be vast having the same general expansion pressure rate on the order of trillions of major galaxies, and there would be another universal region like this with a different rate nearby. A detailed study of my essay and Mark's book is required to understand what I am talking about exactly without me going into excruciating details right now.
I also considered the possibility that changes in expansion pressure could occur in smaller settings than the original version I thought of. We don't technically know enough to say whether or not different chemical systems exist outside of this solar system in the Milky Way. We don't know enough to say if smaller systems could exist at different expansion rates because we don't know enough about the mechanisms by which expansion is controlled. It is implausible in general that changes to what would appear to be the physical constants of the universe could be so easily altered in smaller regions of space or around smaller systems like galaxies, stars, or even planets, but we don't know enough about field theory to rule this out entirely. We need to know more about the relationship between expansion pressure, volume , space, and hypothetical transdimensional fields such as the 4th dimensional etheric I discuss in the core essay.
I am generally skeptical of the possibility of any overly weird outcome in these areas that I have thought about, so generally I believe that the physics and chemistry based on expansion pressure and the periodic table we know are the same in, at least, this galaxy, and probably for some great extent in the extra-galactic space away from this galaxy. I also believed that variations in expansion pressure would be very gradual and slow over the whole of a large area of space so that instead of having one area that was radically different from another, one galaxy might have one thousandth of one percent difference from the next one let's say. However this is a function of my scientific conservatism on the matter. We don't know what's out there and how it works and need alot of time to understand the new model before we can truly say what is possible with it.
Comparing what is known about z-pinch effects and using Mark's model of electron expansion, it would be possible to develop a physical mechanism explanation that shows why z-pinch effects do what they do. It clearly is something to do with the flow of electrons like that of a river moving mass through pressure. Once this idea is understood I think it will obvious what is happening from the new perspective.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)