Astrology: The Analysis of Energy

You are a vibration.

Vibration is acted on by cosmic vibration through cosmic force.

When acted upon by force vibration evolves.

That is the essence of Astrology. 

There are many metaphysical subjects which are highly questionable when taken too seriously.  Astrology is the least so because it has the most physical in nature of the metaphysical topics.  I don't, in fact, really consider astrology a metaphysical topic at all in fact.  The reasons for this are relatively easy to explain.

When anyone or thing is born the planets, Sun, and Moon are aligned in a very precise way that is determined by a data reading from a chart called an ephemeris.  This physical reality is recorded by the thousands of years old tradition of keeping track where celestial objects are related to the constellations which are the background.

The constellations are the signs of the zodiac, a 360 degree wheel where the planets move around the Sun as they orbit it.  There are 12 signs associated with certain particular themes of existence based on basic psychological numerology.  In this respect, because it is rooted in basic philosophy and advanced psychology, the arguments for astrology are sound.

Beyond this there is a physical understanding of astrology.  Everything is a vibration down to its mathematical certainty in creation.  Behind the mathematics are the physical structures which surround us at all times, the magnetic fields of the Earth, and the larger and very vast magnetic field of the Sun.  These two structures are constantly under the influence of each other.  In addition the planets are moving through the Sun's field creating waves in it that are no doubt detected by Earth's magnetic field because of the huge size of these structures. 

This is a pattern that is force and energy in combination to produce vibration upon you, another vibration.  That is the physical explanation as to why astrology works.  However the interpretation of astrology is a matter that is actually entirely debatable for the nature of the field transformation effects of the planets, Sun, and Moon are subject to considerable debate among astrologers.  Most astrologers are either too positive or too negative in their interpretations.

What we are most looking for in astrology is the timing of energetics, the proper use of energy at particular times that are least resisted by collective pressures from society and the world.  This is what the primary branch of astrology works with when we talk of transits.  Transits are caused by the change in position of the planets relative to the time you were born.  There are specific energetic triggers caused by geometric alignment that lead to resistance being born especially of sensitive individuals to the shift in position of the systems of cosmic alignment, which are the planets, Sun, and Moon again.

Astrology allows one to analyze the energy of a particular person or situation and guesstimate an outcome based upon the energetics of the person, the place, and the celestial objects.  The predictability is high for simple situations and correspondingly lower for complex ones, but the feeling is always the same for those experiencing the situations described by transit astrology.  A second form of astrology exists called the progressed school of astrology.  This one looks at the internal dynamics a person's soul development as a human.  There are additional ways of looking at astrology including vedic, solar return chart, and several other commonly used methods.

What a person needs to know is that astrology gives them information about the best time to do things and the best time to sit back and reserve their energy until a better time.  In addition the challenges of life can be prepared for better with astrology as the timing of events are more often then not linked to the emergent property of the astrological situation.  This emergent property appears magical but is rooted in basic mathematical synchronicity.  Relationship dynamics are similarly governed by another mathematically structured system called synastry.  All of this is governed indirectly by the symmetry of coincidence, the mathematical principle behind unexpected events.  Thus there is a structure and order to the completion of projects that allows for the flow of energy in accordance to the astrological timing.

How important is this?  It depends on what you want to get done.  I view the matter as a question of divine timing built into the charts specifically to give credence to the power of those things which are greater than ourselves.  Such a reason and logic is a subtlety, something which bespeaks of a sensitive and receptive character.  Such people can make the most out of astrology and energetic alignment concepts.  People who are more bullish don't have use for astrology, but they run the risk of challenging a will greater than their own in society most often that represents the power of the Sun, Moon, and planets are representatives of cosmic order.  Rebels are great till they blow up the grain silo.

This sort of reasoning was never going to have universal appeal in this day and age.  But, as we recognize our place in the universe as being sentient and least in importance compared with the bigger picture represented by the celestial objects (really we should call them beings) we take into account the true measure of our humanity.  For such a delicate and receptive age to come into being would go far to advancing the cause of consciousness on this Earth.  Indeed it is my opinion that Aquarius is the true sign of astrology and as we enter into the Aquarian Age more fully astrology will probably be the only school of thought in the metaphysical arena that will be much tolerated by the atheist majority.  As such it can expected to have a strong influence on many societies as we move forwards in time.  

Science, Philosophy, Metaphysics, and Politics

What is what and where, how, and when does it go?  These are the questions of science and metaphysics.  Philosophy asks why does it go?  Psychology asks is it all in your head?  And there is the ground for the Great Debate between four (technically psychology is a subset of the three) schools of thought on the nature of reality.

What we know so far from the New Science is that the universe is made of electrons of all the same size and mass which expand at a certain rate determined somehow, most likely through fourth dimensional etheric density changes in my version of the New Science.  None the less, what follows from that is the paradigm of reality that the majority will study in the future of science itself.

There will still be a massive debate with the old quantum school of thought called Standard Theory.  I personally have no interest right this second in personally debating anyone as my level of trust in my fellow humans is a bit dim at the moment and I'm not interested in being personal attacked for being right.  Some other people I know are in a similar dilemma about psychology and that part of the Truth.

Still the questions remain and there will be those who have the time necessary to attempt to solve the unanswered questions that the theories suggested pose.  My metaphysical writings have been removed from this website except for what was left in the philosophy of knowledge essay though that is mostly philosophy and defining boundaries between things which is the primary purpose one should study philosophy.

I will add a few thoughts in this essay about science now because I want to primarily.  I believe electrons are created and destroyed under certain conditions.  I believe that parallel dimensions (not the time traveling or multiple versions of the same universe ones) exist in some capacity but I'm not sure if they exist on the same infinity physical plain or are co-axial through the 4th dimension existing in different nodes within that dimension.  Not that it matters that much for the ultimate question of why does any of it matter?

Much of my metaphysical work attempted to answer that last question by saying the cosmos is a giant infinite grab bag of stuff where beings get more and more and more over time through the work they do in their lives but everything is more or less programmed into the system dependent on the consciousness to wake up and do what it needs to do to fulfill the promise of eternal life in the living moment of their existing one.  If it sounds tough, it is a bit.  You can't both stare into infinity and live on the ground floor for too long without infinity getting to becoming a problem.

At the same time knowing of the infinite is a self provable philosophical series of reasoning that says your stuck with the infinite stuff but more importantly the people who are there sharing (what's that word mean says the vast majority) eternity with you.  These people are here to stay no matter what their condition in this life.  The eternal connection exists but outside of their consciousness because of the condition of their lives.

With the idea of eternal infinite connection, gridwork as it should be called, comes the idea that we should be doing good to each other because that connection exists everywhere and in everyone.  The catch is that we have a right to withdraw if we are unacknowledged.  Rejection exists to prove the right of assertion and the right of me or you.  The boundary is based on the problem of full knowledge.

Full knowledge is the idea that one must truly fully recognize another person before the gates to a real relationship can be created.  This applies interestingly enough to the contents of science, metaphysics, and philosophy.  Treat your teachers with kindness or watch all the content disappear and you are the one now who must create you own gridmap through science, metaphysics, and philosophy.  I did it.  I've left probably 50% of my original essays up especially the science ones.  The rest are gone due to lack of support and attacks.  I did alot of work to get where I am in my understanding of the universe.  The response to free content is not to attack the one giving it.  And so it is gone.

The questions still remain.  But those subtle enough to pursue the great answers again will have to realize that there is a game that unfortunately trumps free inquiry.  That game is politics.

I will not go further into that information as it is simply too dangerous to actually explain how politics works with people in its psychology but I will describe a bit on how it works in general.  Simply put, with politics, the devil is in the details.  It is because of politics that the personal becomes the political.  Truth is attacked!  Why, you might ask?  Because politics is about keeping the balance of power and maintaining privilege over the all important access to resources such as free information.  Formalists run this world, even if they are not so great at protocol, logic, or law.  But they do know one thing much better than the majority, that is how to silence dissenting voices efficiently using force, manipulation, and countervailing opinion.

Can we see past that pattern of relating?  This is the great question of consciousness.  Will we become consciousness enough of the game to stop it before science, philosophy, and metaphysics are gone?  And the game doesn't stop there we could lose art, music, and journalism too for all three of these are ideally representing science (journalism), art (metaphyiscs), and music (philosophy).  The game could also get rid of mathematics.  Where nothing is sacred, nothing is safe.

Will we live in a world where free inquiry exists?  More importantly will we live in a world where people can exist free from the threats of global warming, nuclear proliferation, nuclear reactors, and thought police?  Can a consensus be built without the later?  Increasingly the answer seems to be no.  Everyone must have their thought police because the stakes are everything.

This is where we stand.  Universalism is a doctrine that is created out of the fusion of globalism and multiculturalism in all its variants.  Yet without a final judgement on the question about what about the rest of everyone that doesn't agree, it represents just another version of the endlessly reemerging political beast in another form.  For this to work there must be no separation between anyone and anyone else.  We are all each other.  There is no middle ground.

Time is against universalism as it has too few adherents for right now.  The opposite schools of thought are anti-universalist.  Nationalism in all its forms is an example.  But so to is parochialism, tribalism, racism, classicism, and various sundry religious and ideological groups,   The battle is between division and unification and division is winning.  No amount of dividing will result in a unification.  Yet to get to unification requires philosophy and a tiny bit of metaphysics added for clarity.

Science is held up by politics, and metaphysics and philosophy are held up by the lack of interest in refined explanations of being caused by real life on Earth.  Hunger is the great adversary of meaningful conversation.  Today it seems as through cell phones are the new great adversary.   None the less, this is as far as we've gotten with the problem of everything as it stands.

Tomorrows debates may be my own, but everyone will need to find out what it is that they are going to do to save themselves and the planet.  That's really what it all comes down to.  The planet must be saved.  The people must learn to save themselves.  Will anyone give a shit enough for the real processes to start or is everything just too damn complicated now?  The time to start doing this work was 20 years ago when it was going to be easy.   Procrastination further pushes us towards the planetary end game, the end of the human species itself.  We are getting close to the end.

Humanity does not have any time left to talk about timetables.  Action is the only thing that matters now.  We've been through the bullshit plan stage of the science of climate change.  It's a delay tactic to prevent action so someone can milk it into a paper asset creating device.  Is that the future of the Green Front?  I think not.  What sort of weirdness is this?  How does anyone of those people who signed onto another version of "money making" schemes sleep at night?  No conscience, no problem?  Apparently no one confronts the current environmental "leadership" with their failures.  We don't have time for this crap anymore.  The first thing serious people should do is clean up the left.  The right has no clue though they'll have to understand eventually.

That's the science of it funnily enough.  The science of political art if you will.  Let's just paint them off the canvas.  Get rid of the old leadership, they suck.  Been holding that in for awhile.  The results of a clean house will be great.  What we should do is simply keep firing leaders if they don't take action within a timeframe.  I'm an unreasonable man about this I'd just do all the actions myself without bothering to fire them and then send them a memo or something if they wanted me to advice them.  No what everyone needs to do is basically set a one week action timetable and just do it (and if no action in one week fire the whoever it is).  And once they have done it, keep doing it.  Do that till the world is on renewable energy, the nuclear stuff is all gone in the best way possible, the Amazon is a protected parkland in its entirety with full native rights guaranteed by an effective UN (or even the US can do it), and no fossil fuels are used ever again.  In addition we have to technologically revert the CO2 in the atmosphere back to something reasonable I've suggest 375 ppm, others have suggested 350 ppm.  Whatever works from those two options.

So that's an action oriented do it now anti-plan.  It's easy, you just keep firing the jerks in charge until you get non-jerk who do things.  You can tell their good because they do things and get things done.  There are no excuses.  You don't wait till the next election, you get your collective voice together and say now, now, now.  And after you are done saying now, you say now again.  And after they attack you, you keep saying now.  And after they deny you, you keep saying now.  Together say now.  Together say do it now.  You do this until they get it.  That's the whole "plan".  As you can see it's very simple and easy.  The rest is up to you.

Listenening: The Protocols of Honor

By the deepest concepts of culture are we made whole.  But to get there we must find out first what culture is and why it matters.  From the point of view of the primitive, culture is irrelevant.  That is the problem with primitivism which is the state of nature as it exists in the minds of humans that live without any notion of honor or ritual.  This is the essential difference between that which is primitive and that which is cultured.  A cultured individual has a protocol and honors that protocol.  A primitive has no protocol and honors only his or her whims. 

Here I must state the fundamental basis of all protocol for the record of the collective that requires it.  Protocol is based on principle. Principle is rationality through sacrfice by means of deference to any Ideal, Virtue, person, or thing, but specifically it is the grounds of one's argument.  When any philosopher speaks of principle they usually are referring to ideal principle. Ideal Principle is the perfect image of an abstract principle fully conscious as a platonic form.  Virtue is most often the emotionally centered reality of any principle in action through the changes it induces in others by it's transformational capacity as a living essence surrounding a single actor (she or he that acts), most specifically a person from our point of view.

There is, as I have stated before in my Philosophy of Knowledge notes, a natural hierarchy of prioritization which exists that influences the deliverance of conscience through values, desires, principles, duties, virtues, and even conscience itself.   That hierarchy is constructed by individuals naturally in the course of their lives as they discover what it is that motivates them to take any actions.  As such it is primarily the ground of reasoning of Formal Moralism and used by Formal Moralists to justify their own actions as part of the accounting of personal argument.

But beyond this reasoning lies the other, who is or is not aware of any of this.  Communicating with the other requires that one understand that all just communications are based upon the notion of Transactions of Honor.  Roughly stated a transaction of honor in the field of communication is the idea that one listens in return for the right to speak and vice versa that one speaks with the intention to listen to the response. 

Here we must get into the nature of honorable communications and just honoring of the other and the self.  Listening is followed by listening.  A speech is worth a speech.  A thought is worth a thought.  This natural transaction of experiences and minds is the basis of the protocol of honor.  Since everything begins in communication, we begin here for those who wish to participate in Honor Culture which is the culture of true wealth. 

The self is revealed in stages to the other based on interest.  Questions and answers form the basis of the transaction of relationship.  Actions taken are the measure of the value assigned to the relationship.  Each action is met with an equal and opposite reaction until full intimacy is achieved.  That full intimacy is one of friendship, the true measure of all intimacy.

Not all want to participate in this transaction as they would prefer to only think or talk of themselves or spread rumors.  As such the world is divided between those that practice honor and those who do not.  There are commandments unwritten that govern the entire cycle.  Beyond this stage, there is living in the moment to total connection with the stream of conscience that surrounds us at all times.  

This is a very short introduction to a very complex and elaborate truth about perfectly honoring the experience we are having as people specifically with relation to ourselves, other people. the planet, and by extension the universe.  Honor culture does not end at people and things.  It extends into the honoring of any tradition of communication with any hypothetical reality one has heard of.  As such one's relationship to ideas, methodologies, and hypothetical non physical beings are included.  Included in this is one's relationship to skepticism and doubt as well.  Honor is a very, very complex beast. 

Very much of our extended lives are tied to what we honor in ourselves and in others.  The subtlety of existence is defined by that experience internal to ourselves.  While the majority of our experience is the honoring of our gross selves, the body and it's needs, the rest of our experience collectively is determined by the nature of how we honor everything else about everyone else including the abstract notions of being and beyond that, for those that have it, the psychic perceptions of the those gifted of conscious subtly in it's many various forms.  The set of all the possible combinations of this conundrum is the basis of formal study of Mystery, Art, Music, and Kaballah. 

The essential question is what makes us different from each other from the point of view of the universe or Goddess and God depending on your point of view.  When we try to understand someone we look at the whole of their experience, the whole of what they know, the whole of their choices, the strength of their conviction, the strength of their character, and the physical strength of their body.  Their identity determines their viewpoint.  Their potential and their intention determines what the Oracle can and can't tell them.  The choices they are offered are a part and parcel of those offering those choices and their stories as well.  As you can see to honor all of that is something truly magnificent and time consuming for those doing the honoring.  As such we honor those closest to us.  Such is the way of things.

Again there is one road deeper than this that I have learned from another further along the path than I.  This road takes us into the emotion itself as experienced through the whole of the breath into the lifestream of consciousness as it is lived.  Here, the protocols of honor still exist, but they become secondary to the experience of an inner guidance that is beyond what is normally experienced.  Here listening becomes a skilled fused with full human consciousness honed to create an experience called Natural Synastry,  A person who has this experience is free of the need for formalism and becomes the living embodiment of the Virtues for others.  Jesus was the greatest of these examples of those who truly managed to see past the need for transactions of honor to arrive complete honoring through pure consciousness through embodiment.

But the need for honoring remains to the extent that it is necessary to consider the perspectives of all.  The world cannot avoid the full honoring of every other and simply jump into Natural Synastry.  Before Natural Synastry is the astrologically timed Unnatural Synastry as well which is the honoring of the cycles of existence as interpreted through astrology.  Some elements of Unnatural Synastry can also be found in lesser forms of divination such as tarot.  But the problem of character emerges when these interpretations clash with the Natural Synastry of the awakened person who will not simply allow an interpretation to be the decider of their fate.  This is a tricky ground for the reader and the querrant (the person getting the reading) alike.  

Protocols of honor extend to all these fields of endeavor.  Perfecting them allows one to read or interpret perfectly.  Failure to create a protocol of honor in the absence of the necessary psychic and/or mental gifts necessary for Natural Synastry creates disturbances in the consciousness of the self and others.  Further refinement is always required.  Perfect readings lead to perfect outcomes.  It is possible but requires learning and an acknowledgement of imperfection.  Yet this is all part of the greater picture of honoring choice and honoring methods of ordering action.

Who is it that one must follow when one is not sure?  This is a great question of both the advisor and the advisee.  We all wish to speak with an authority on this matter, but at times we find ourselves puzzlingly enough as the authority seeking advice from others on the question of our own authority to decide.  Most don't care enough to test their own limits, to ask themselves where they should stop and seek the advice of others.  But as luck would have it sometimes they stumble upon someone both competent and honorable to the art and the other person alike.

A massive subject is this thing we call honor.  Honor is not a perfect measurement of our selves, but an acknowledgement of our imperfection without the other.  There are limits of course, for honoring one's self is required as part of the idea of honor or honor itself is destroyed by it's opposite dishonor.  The balance is delicate and requires experience to teach us the limits of this methodology of culture.  But as long as civilization exists and as long as there are those who wish to remain civilized, we'll be hearing a great deal more about honor in the years, decades, centuries, and millennia to come. 

Thoughts on the Basic Cosmic Set

Thoughts on the Basic Cosmic Set

During the course of my meditations on my visions, an idea was presented to me that the cosmos revolved around the theme of repeating patterns of evolving spirits incarnating as celestial objects and celestial formations rooted in singular celestial objects.  This idea was the idea of the planetary, solar, galactic, metagalactic, etc archon ring cycle.  Essentially, infinite desire should over time give rise to the experience of incarnation as a cosmic being who creates in the higher planes and then in the lower planes. 

The essential nature of the archon was thus visualized to be a being who lived on the etheric plane in a sort of preincarnation existence which lasted about half the full length of time of incarnation that would be created and lived a life in that plane rehearsing its experience before incarnating as whatever it was going to incarnate as in the physical.  The rehearsal was done with the others it was going to incarnate with a-prioii to the incarnation. 

As I studied the idea of the archons and allowed myself the flow of the mystery through the mystic experience of visions certain messages came to me regarding what it would require to prove the existence of this entire idea.  The primary concept around which this idea would be proven would be what I call the “Basic Set” or the “Basic Cosmic Set” which is the experiencing in creation that allowed a being to go from an electron in the cosmos to a full fledged lunar body, the planetary archon 1.  The exact dimensions of this planetary Archon 1 weren’t clear, but the general rule of a trillion times for each level of the cosmos and each level of higher consciousness is what I settled on as a formula observing the nature of what we see in the universe.

Logically, if we believe in reincarnation, then the number of cycles it takes for a being to evolve is essentially scientifically fixed to an average around which the growth of the being follows an expected path of development across multiple worlds of creation until finally they emerge as a full fledged Planetary Archon 1.

The science surrounding this should be based on a known mathematical formula based on the evolutions in the physical world first, and then in the higher dimensions second.  So, first we must understand the basic nature of the physical universe in all its aspects in order to understand the number of cycles it would take for a being to evolve in the cosmic hierarchy to higher stations of development.  Such an undertaking is not at all a light affair, but a rather heavy, if not the heaviest, set of thinking concerning the nature of the soul and how that souls evolves.  We are dealing with a science of reincarnation here that is exacting in its precision.

My essential idea of the basic set must be first analyzed in the context of how I personally see the physical universe’s cycles of creation.  I believe the physical universe functions essentially as the technological universe and the lower natural universe for the cosmos.  Here matter is the basic resource and all energy is tied to it as we well know hopefully by now.  The themes of the physical universe all revolve around the emergence of civilizations on planets that seek to go out into space and explore and colonize areas of development and create wealth for themselves and their future reincarnating selves in the context of a single civilization until such time as a cosmic disaster or rare ego based invasion of another species destroys them. 

The physical universe is ruled by the natural cycles of cosmic ray abundance caused by the natural cycles of rotation creating the seasons of the cosmos.  These seasons correspond to the periods of growth and expansion and contraction and shortage we would find in the cosmos.  Most of the cosmos is governed, in my guesstimate, by great cycles of peace which last 200 times longer than the cycles of war and 2000 times the cycles of heavy darkness (corruption). 

During the times of peace, the cosmos is ruled by different sets of principle discovered by benevolent cosmic citizens, the sentients, who have evolved full conscious civilizations and essentially treat the cosmos as part of a divine master plan.  These civilizations seek to catalog and know the cosmos and all the beings in it besides attempting to consciously and conscientiously grow their own civilizations as part of their cosmic rights.  Each time a being is born into an incarnation chain, the being in question lives a long series of lifetimes, possibly as long as trillions of years even in the initial emergences, in one of these groups.

Because the physical universe revolves around these patterns, it is rare for the existence of societies who wish to live a more primitive life such as those depicted in magical themes in our fiction.  These must exist, however, and it is my general opinion that the ratio in the physical universe between those who wish to live technological vs. natural "magical" lives is about 4 to 1, but that the definition of natural is different when considering the question of the nature of physical cosmic systems as per their primary drives.

This last part, a sort of strange argument for anyone who doesn’t live in my head, is related to the idea that of the “technological” peoples of the physical universe (they are of course all technological technically), only about half are truly technological in the sense of what type of universe it is they are creating.  Half of those technological people are living in a natural universe by preference, meaning that technology supplements an organic lifecycle for natural born beings.  These beings, thus, limit their populations to a certain amount to account for the idea that nature is primary.  They may use technology greatly, but they are not trying to turn the cosmos into a giant computer system run by robots.

The other half of the cosmos is either run by robots or is so pro-technology that natural systems are seen to supplement the maximum sustainable sentient population theory of development.  This is the true technological universe.  In that universe, it’s ultimate end goal is to create dyson spheres everywhere for the conversion of all matter into sentient populations.  The end result of this universe is an energy crisis and what I refer to as an Archon crisis because the stars are largely destroyed or completely chained to dyson sphere machinery in order to sustain massive populations, most often of robots and beings who have chosen to evolve as cybernetic organisms of various sorts.

Once one understand the whole of this idea, one begins to see what the nature of the physical cosmos is like.  Luckily, those that live in the cosmos rarely allow for the mass development of the whole thing into a technological nightmare.  Instead, core regions tend towards more technology whereas outer regions tend to be more towards nature.  There is a boundary point between the two paradigms that are usually balanced.  This boundary point is the point at which sentient species use more cosmic rays than the cosmos produces to sustain natural star growth and development.  This is the critical boundary between the half of the natural universe that stays natural and the half that chooses to go technological.

In addition to these two parts, one in five regions in general remain “magical” which is natural with specific properties of elements that allows for the evolution of what we know as magic in our fictional stories.  These emerge from the incorporation of elements that are projectively radioactive into organic bodies which is easier at higher expansion pressures (see Mark McCutcheon’s the Final Theory or my essay on Expansion Theory which is the Core Essay on chrisfreely.com) where more elements exist on the periodic table.  As a consequence of the requirements for more expansion pressure, these areas would be considered outside the safe boundaries of a natural universe anyway until such time as they evolve to incorporate the necessary technology or natural systems to overcome the problems of going from areas with one expansion pressure to areas with another (a very, very hard problem to solve even compared with building arrays of thousands of dyson spheres as far as I can tell). 

None the less, the basic idea is that the physical universe is divided into different domains of activity.  At the bottom domains with fewer natural physical elements occupying about 4/7ths of the cosmos a conflict exists between technologically developing species and natural developing species which divides the physical cosmos into two general areas that are defined by technology and nature even though both are dominated by species that are essentially space faring technology driven development oriented.  The balance of the cosmic good slightly prefers nature over technology, but at times technology is considered better usually for survival reasons as technology is hardier and better at surviving more conditions. The remaining 3/7ths of the cosmos is split between "magical" and "transmagical" regions dominated by beings that may have a greater inclination to avoid technology for a much, much longer time period and who have natural defenses against technology in the form of the natural properties of their universe which allows for a natural defense mechanism against beings who have technology from regions of lower expansion pressure density.  2/7ths of the cosmos is the region that is essentially “magical” and 1/7^th is “transmagical” where powers such as what we consider to be superpowers may emerge naturally from the even higher expansion pressure of these regions of the cosmos.  The general idea is that transmagical is even more powerful than magical and represents what we might consider divine powers as opposed to ordinary magical powers.

Now, beings would obviously want to incarnate in the more powerful regions of the cosmos, so there is a training time that occurs in the lower regions essentially by incarnation chain.  Want to incarnate in a realm of magic?  First you have to pay the entry fee karmically by being incarnated in a loser planet like Earth and finish the proving ground tests.  And what holds together who can incarnate where?  Well, that’s where the Archons come in, for they guard the physical realms as it is they who create them in their mind’s journey as pre-incarnate beings who serve the greater cosmic spiritual powers in planes above them.  Serve them well and you are rewarded and allowed to incarnate in their realms.  Serve them badly and it’s back to a dump like Earth where you have to relearn all your lessons all over again.  Well, not quite.  Actually, Earth is just a planet where everything is just starting up and we don’t any real magic except the kind old occult philosophers obsess over in their boredom. 

Now, cosmic cycles take a long time to complete so when one incarnates somewhere, that’s where you are for anywhere from hundreds of millions to trillions of years (for more ancient spirits the amount of time just gets longer and longer up to infinity in theory).  That’s where the basic set comes in.  Understanding the basic set is the key to knowing the answer of how long it is we spend in creation doing these various projects as part of the life of a particular group of souls as a particular sentient species in the physical universe. 

The basic set is built around the idea that beings are born naturally as electrons.  A certain number of lifecycles as an electron is required to evolve beyond that stage in consciousness when the electron is presumably destroyed for the last time and the spirit that is within it is processed by the creative powers of the transdimensional realms above the physical.  An electron evolves into something.  An atom evolves into something.  A being must spend a certain amount of time as a plant, and then a certain number of evolutions as an animal.  After that is must eventually evolve a conscience somewhere in the cosmos through ultimate selfless sacrifice to have a sentient soul body.  This is when it is now a Sentient Archon 1.

The difference in power from a Sentient Archon 1 to a Planetary Archon 1 I assumed was a trillion.  A sentient Archon 1 is a planetary bound spirit because there just aren’t that many asteroids around to allow for small bodies to exist in space in such large numbers as the math requires.  This creates one of the more interesting metaphysical problems of soul theory whereby the Planetary Archons and above are anchored to the cosmic chain of creation whereas the Sentient Archons and below are anchored to the planet’s world soul more so in order to incarnate their afterlives within it.  It’s a bit of a complex idea to get your brain around.  The whole entire basic set, when mapped out, is literally the science of evolution of the soul as a set of principles that tells you the mathematical relationship between these levels of creation and the math of the entire reincarnation system up until Planetary Archon 1.

This, of course, cannot be a small system.  My first intuitions on the matter was that it would take hundreds of incarnation cycles on something like 800 initial planets or more to go from Sentient Archon 1 to Planetary Archon 1.  Now that isn’t math, but when I started doing the fuzzy math just with what I thought I knew at the time of probable lengths of time the numbers were still in the high hundreds.  That’s hundreds of sentient species alone that a being has to incarnate through not counting their transdimensional lifecycles as spirit beings in higher planes of creation.  When we add the math up in the larger estimates this is quadrillions of years just to get from Sentient Archon 1 to Planetary Archon 1 to earn higher permissions in cosmic creation.

The idea of needing higher permissions is based on the concept that the cosmos is ruled by higher dimensional beings who have mentally created the domains of the cosmos that we live in as sentients a-priorii to nature having formed them through its processes which occur within the context of the cosmic mind internally as a process.  In other words, nature’s machinery is on a lower plane of operation than the will of creation of the beings who shape the cosmos as it moves slower and within the context of the will of creation of the desires of cosmic spirit beings.  The planets and stars are these very Archons who have created themselves in the same way it is presumed that the lesser and tiny yet more able to determine their destiny sentients have created their lives in the higher planes by previsualization in the higher spirit bodies as angels(A common spiritual and New Age concept).  It is only by service to the will of the cosmos’s highest good that permissions to exist are granted by these cosmic gatekeepers who are older in general than those who live on the surface as sentients.

Another concept that is critical to understand about my paradigm is the idea of the cosmic voyeur god and goddess and multiple layers of cosmic voyeurism that excludes sexual domains of activity.  The desire to be cosmic god or goddess, not an Archon as they don’t actually observe the lives of other beings in such a way, is the desire to observe creation from a higher plane almost as if you were watching a living simulation.  It is the desire to create something that is a living simulation from your desire, the same as the computer programmer or story teller desires to see how things play out with his or her creations.  God and Goddess on this higher plane are, in fact, the cosmic voyeurs who watch over but don’t interfere with the creation which occurs within their spirit space and the powers that thought of what it was before it came into being.

The basic set has to account for this time as well, as beings do live out these sorts of experiences in lesser regards it is presumed before they become greater at this process, such as being the God/Goddess of a town long before one is a God/Goddess of a galaxy.  The cosmos is then linked together through these different fields of consciousness in higher planes of creation creating a sort of dynamic field of consciousness that is beyond the realm of physical humans to relate to or experience in any easy way except through advanced altered states of consciousness which have great cost to those pursuing them. 

Then there is the problem of the human ego that is beyond the scope of this essay which is focused on the idea of the basic set as the ultimate map of cosmic relationships in principle.  In order to know for sure it is necessary to observe the physical universe and construct a map of known relationships between essential ratios of physicality in creation.  One important fact, for instance, is what is the guaranteed number of planets that can be terraformed by a species such as ours in a normal natural galaxy based on the fair and just ordering of a species natural rights to express their highest and most obvious ambitions as having just arrived in a galaxy. Since 200 galaxies out of 201 are run by good species, it is logical that these species have already solved the formula and had conventions about this for hundred of millions, billions, trillions, or even quadrillions of years.  In other words, it is a known known because they have had time to think about it.  I had assumed the answer was probably a round number, most likely 1000, but we certainly can’t say for sure only that in all likelihood there is a figure that is known by whoever runs this galaxy as its chief power.

This critical question determines the average rank of the highest level being in a natural born civilization such as ours because the permissions have to line up with the Archon ranks to keep the synchronicity of the cosmos in balance.  While this is beyond the basic set, the basic set is critical to answering other questions concerning cosmic soul age of the more ancient spirits who are the oldest and most powerful of the beings on a particular planet, the planet’s natural leaders.  You should know them well by now, you are expecting one of them to return and bring about the Kingdom of God.  Do you think that Jesus Christ was an ordinary soul even if he was an ordinary human?  The answers should be obviously to anyone who studies karma, reincarnation, and the order of the cosmos.

It is generally assumed by myself that all the greatest human minds and hearts that have lived are the ancient beings here to guide the less old beings forwards in consciousness.  This is a common theme in evolution that teachers are present to guide others in their own understanding of their own place in the cosmos.  There are those who have gone forwards in consciousness in order to show the path to those that walk afterwards.  Now it would be great if this walk were over and the whole of humanity understood everything it needed to know about peace, but even the idea of eternal life is rejected by the human ego.

The idea of the basic cosmic set thus is left for generations of the future to solve.  It is a massive problem that no small order of proof must be forged to support.  As the atheist majority, representative of the human ego of the Aquarian Age, will reject this idea as being “childish” and beneath it’s egoic dignity to consider, it will be left to the more pure spirits of a more childish age to consider past the serious frowns of the worldwide dominant church of atheism.  Well certainly God is dead for the Goddess has risen!  But the voyeur God somewhere in a mirror world beyond ours is certainly laughing about the stupidity of human kind.  For now we will just have to live with the idea that all of what I have written here is just art, and thus sing the praises of scientific atheism as we explore the universe as humans in all it’s glory. 

The Alternative To Cosmic Ray Powered Stars

You can download a copy of this essay here to help spread the word.

The Alternative to Cosmic Ray Powered Stars

by Chris Freely

While creating the cosmic ray powered stars, galaxies, and universe model years ago I had to seriously consider alternative thoughts with regard to our current model, the fusion powered solar paradigm.  I considered the implications of expansion theory in this in order to complete the work began by Mark McCutcheon and to seriously consider whether there were any scenarios under which a universe could exist powered on hydrogen fusion as envisioned by our current ideas.

The model that I developed I called the Hydrogen Regeneration Hydrogen Fusion Universe was based on the idea that hydrogen, if it were possible to generate fusion energy from true proton-proton fusion, would be recycled in this type of universe.  While I ultimately rejected this idea for reasons described below, a basic overview will show the most plausible mechanisms in my understanding of Expansion Theory that might explain our current solar paradigms using the new theory.

In proton-proton fusion as it is currently envisioned through various steps in different types of main sequence stars, four protons combine to form a helium nucleus.  The difference in the mass of four hydrogen atoms and one helium atom is then assumed to be released in the form of energy through Einstein's E=MC^2 equation automatically liberating the energy.  A star is theoretically supported by the force of the fusion of protons that take place in the star's nucleus.  A balance then is created between the amount of fusion necessary to keep the star's current size and gravity which is constantly driving this process.  This is visioned as a dynamic equilibrium in current models.

The question must be asked, where does the energy to propel the liberated missing mass from the protons in the proton-proton fusion reactions come from?  In our current theories there is essentially no answer.  E=MC^2 automatically applies for some reason no one has clearly defined and that no one can clearly explain.  McCutcheon's expansion theory offers a plausible solution to this dilemma as physical mechanisms may exist plausibly in our current hypothetical realms of the possible.

Mark, in his book though, stuck with a similar Einstein idea that simply said once the electrons (the basic particle of matter in the universe of which everything including protons and neutrons are made in the new theory) are released from their nuclear confinement they automatically just expand at a massive rate (because they are already doing so anyway within the atom) and are thus liberated as free energy.  This is similar to Einstein's idea though with a graphical representation of liberated electron clusters flying through non-atomic space at the huge non nuclear natural expansion rate of the electron in that the electron automatically has this energy built into it somehow without having to account for it in any way.  I couldn't agree to the idea in total because it denies the fact that energy is carried by these electrons as a function of their relative motion, which in physics analysis is called vector motion.

In my own analysis I found that the idea that freely expanding electron clusters carried huge energy difficult to digest in light of the problem of vector motion which I wrote about extensively in the analysis.  Essentially, the problem is that energy is still energy.  When things move they have an inertia and that energy is conserved and vector motion needs to be conserved if things aren't going to get too weird.  Freely expanding electron clusters, in my estimation, simply cannot be ejected from the nucleus and be expected to carry a massive energy automatically.  I could not visual this idea at all as it failed logical tests in my own mind concerning the ideas of energy.  Of course I accepted the idea of the clusters expansion, just not the free energy lunch part of it.

The alternative to this is to construct a mechanism within the nucleus to account for energy as it is classically understood (more or less).  In our case we would have to construct a model of the proton that would allow for the energy to be liberated through a mechanism similar to that of a spring.  A metal spring stores physical energy and a spring represents the best analogy to something that may, once it's pent up structure is unhinged, release stored physical energy in a manner that is consistent with latent buildup of pressure in structure.  If the hydrogen atom is so constructed, then indeed it would be possible to make such a process work assuming the energy contained in the structure in sufficient once liberated to account for what is required for the solar fusion model to work.  I have suggested that deuterium and tritium as well as other proven energetically releasing atoms and isotopes have some pent up structural mechanism at work that when broken releases this stored pressure within their structure.

In such a system, an energy storing mechanism would have to be constructed to account for why energy was stored in hydrogen in the first place.  The mechanism I decided on was cosmic ray bombardment of the heavy nuclei of deep space and old stellar cores.  These cosmic rays could reintroduce energy into what are (in current theory) considered to be energy poor nucleuses (from the point of view of current fusion theory), especially Iron and Cobalt which are considered in current theory to be the least energetic nucleuses for nuclear fusion (or fission for that matter).  Again, that all has to do with the amount of mass in the nucleus as measured relative to other nucleusus in the current E=MC^2 standard model paradigm.  But for our purposes what we are looking for as students of the new Expansion Theory is how hydrogen gets its extra energy that allows it to expel it's "energy per nucleon" into light in the form of electron clusters as the new theory states that light consists of.

This is explained hypothetically by the idea that cosmic rays impart changes in structure to the proton when they impact these large nucleusus in deep space breaking them apart and recharging the universal supply of hydrogen that gets used up in our current model by stars.  In a universe without a big bang you have to explain how it is that everything hasn't quite ended given the fact that all the hydrogen is constantly being used up.  So, obviously, over time, the cosmic rays have to reintroduce the energy back into the equation by evaporating large white dwarves and other old dead stellar cores in our current model slowly converting back into the original material that we currently think of as being the most important for energy generation.  That is, of course, hydrogen.

So we have a plausible physical mechanism of energy storage in hydrogen and a cycle that accounts for what we observe in the universe without resulting in any big bang shenanigans.  However, the problem now is the problem of the lack of a real physical model of the atom.  We don't have one yet.  And in addition, the bigger problem is that protons, as we understand them now, are just too simple of a structure to be structured in a way that suggests they could possibly store energy through a complex mechanism that allows for such a hypothetical pressure storage whether spring like or not.  The more complex deuterium and tritium don't have this problem.  And that creates a big pickle for the nuclear powered fusion model in the new Expansion Theory paradigm.

While I envisioned a proton as being made of huge numbers of electrons as described in my core essay, an idea strongly supported by existing physical experiments primarily Max Plank's, the simple number of electrons still isn't sufficient to account for the complexity suggested.  There is no current evidence of a complex hydrogen nucleus that suggest it could possibly store energy in such a manner.  Now, of course, no one has had to look for one yet, but still it would require a huge amount of research and thinking to suggest where we could go from here with this idea.  It goes against everything we think we know so far in that hydrogen is the simple nucleus consisting of a single proton and an single electron "probability" cloud.  Where would it hide a mechanism for the mechanical storage of energy?  Deuterium and tritium have at least a neutron or two and a proton that could overlap accounting for the stored energy, but what about the lowly proton? 

In this idea we consider the classical case for energy again as known physics suggests.  Energy is motion and vector motion is conserved so that energy outside the boundary of the expanding electron is real in this world.  It doesn't diminish so the universe is a mechanical machine made of expanding electrons and the ever present vector motion of these very electrons that are the carriers of this motion and are the transformers of it in space (again my core essay goes into the physical descriptions in great detail and what would properly be described as the physical philosophy of expanding matter and energy).

In order to support the idea of standard fusion in the new model mechanical energy must be stored in the hydrogen atom to account for the energy necessary to support stars as they are currently envisioned in the fusion model of stars.  No physical proof of these support structures exists.  No physical model exists.  No explanation that is based on real physics exist.  Our current stellar theories are a fantasy.  They have no basis in real science.  They have never been proven through extensive observation.  Constant new evidence is being discovered which discounts what is claimed in the finer points of current stellar theory.  And more new evidence will come to light exposing the weaknesses in current theory with each passing year.

Yet cosmic ray powered stars have a support mechanism that I have described vividly in complete physical detail down to a great extent.  That is a fact.

For those who wish to try and salvage the only thing that is possibly even remotely salvageable from convention cosmology, the fusion powered model of the star, I have given you all the tools necessary to find what it is you must be looking for.  Good luck.  And it would be delightful if you gave me some credit when you start down your thought experiments.  I was there first pointing you in the right direction.  May the best theory win in the light of the evidence of science.